Historical Precedent Supports Republicans on Supreme Court Nominations

POLITICS & POLICY




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

A
s I have argued, historical precedents support Senate Republicans in drawing a distinction in election-year Supreme Court nominations. When the president’s party controls the Senate, as it does in 2020, the Senate majority is well within its historic rights in confirming a nominee. It has done so 17 times out of 19. When the opposition party controls the Senate, as it did in 2016, the Senate majority is well within its historic rights in declaring that the two branches are deadlocked and the nomination should be held open for whichever party wins the national election. Only one out of ten …

Articles You May Like

The Morning Briefing: RFK Jr.’s X Factor Cred Is Picking Up Some Steam
Intelligence employee admits FBI was behind Alex Jones lawsuit and agents were in the crowd on January 6
Even CNN Admits It: ‘Inflation Is Hotter Than We Were Expecting’
Move Over ‘Latinx’: There’s a New Fake Word No One Is Going To Use
VIDEO: Iranian Parliament Celebrates Missile Attack on Israel – Chanting “Death to Israel!” from Floor of Parliament

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *