How to Fix Judicial-Confirmation Hearings



dam J. White, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute who serves as executive director of George Mason University’s C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State, writes in the Washington Post that Supreme Court confirmation hearings are “indispensable.” White contends that hearings are worth preserving because they provide nominees with the opportunity to demonstrate the requisite legal acumen, and Americans with a chance to at once “focus their minds on the Constitution,” and have their voices heard “through their elected senators.”

He is right to say that on balance it is better to hold confirmation hearings …

Articles You May Like

A Surreal Evening with Andrew Cuomo and Billy Crystal
Legal Analyst Sunny Hostin: Democrats Adding Justices is Actually ‘Unpacking’ Supreme Court!
Proof! Sen. Marsha Blackburn Shows How Twitter Censors by Citing MRC
Lifelong Democrat And City Council Official In Flint, Michigan Announces He’s Backing Trump (VIDEO)
Chinese hackers target U.S. defense, national security networks ahead of Election Day

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *