The SEC’s Green Name Game

US
Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Kelly/Reuters)
The agency is not — and should not be — in the business of deciding what is good for the environment and society.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

W
hen considering the prospect of “green” finance, I’m often tempted to burst into song: Green, green, bo-bean, bo-na-na fanna, fo-fean, fee fi mo-mean. Green! Perhaps this can be attributed to my children, who are entranced by the rhymes in Shirley Ellis’s iconic song, “The Name Game.” Yet rather fortuitously, that song can actually help us in thinking about how to name investment products.

While determining what “green” means — or what qualifies as such — is not a new endeavor, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently begun to wrestle with it for investment products. As funds advertising themselves as …

To Read the Full Story

Articles You May Like

Mattel releases Barbie doll based on transgender actor Laverne Cox: ‘We are proud to highlight the importance of inclusion and acceptance at every age’
Univision On-Air Editorial at Border Calls for ‘Comprehensive Immigration Reform’
Ruhle Suggests Civil War Never Ended, Wonders How ‘Sick’ is America
Don Lemon Sets Up Houston Mayor to Lobby Against NRA Convention
Bill Gates the bioterrorist’s plan for global control

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published.