Why Public Universities Shouldn’t Force Religious Clubs to Have Non-Religious Leaders

POLITICS & POLICY
Students on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, N.C., in 2018. (Jonathan Drake/Reuters)
Whether Christian, Muslim, conservative, or liberal, student groups are, and should be, free to require their leaders to adhere to their beliefs.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

I
magine if National Review’s editor-in-chief were Rachel Maddow. Your immediate thought (after perhaps picking yourself up off the floor) is the obvious: The content would communicate a vastly different message. This is because “personnel is policy.”

This is no less true at America’s public universities, which these days often attempt to dictate personnel decisions, especially the people that student organizations must elect as their leaders. Most recently, the University of Houston–Clear Lake refused to recognize a Christian apologetics group, Ratio Christi, because, although membership is open to anyone, the group requires its leadership to demonstrate commitment to the Christian faith.

Of course, if the College

To Read the Full Story

Articles You May Like

BREAKING: Rep. Chip Roy Reveals ONLY $47 Billion of the $113 Billion in Ukraine Funding Went to Lethal Aid – What Was the Other $66 Billion Used For? (VIDEO)
‘Substantial risks’: USC releases outside commencement speakers just days after axing Muslim student’s valedictorian speech
MRC’s Brent Bozell with Levin on Staggering Facebook Election Interference: ‘It’s Systematic’
What role does AI have to play in the future of human artistic expression?
NewsBusters Podcast: A Fervent Obsession with Trump Trial Jury Selection

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *