This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—April 8

POLITICS & POLICY
Judge Stephen Reinhardt

2005—A split Ninth Circuit panel, in an opinion by notorious activist judge Stephen Reinhardt, rules in a habeas case (Musladin v. Lamarque) that under clearly established Supreme Court law a defendant on trial for murder was deprived of his right to a fair trial by an impartial jury when the trial judge permitted family members of the victim (or, as Reinhardt insists on referring to him in quotes, the “victim”) to wear buttons bearing the deceased’s photograph. (The panel will later substitute in a slightly different version of its opinion.)

In 2006, a mere two months after oral argument, the Supreme Court (in Carey v. Musladin) will unanimously reverse the Ninth Circuit.

2015—Shirley, you can’t be serious!

The day after Wisconsin voters amend the state constitution to alter the method for determining who is chief justice of the Wisconsin supreme court, Wisconsin chief justice Shirley S. Abrahamson files a federal lawsuit contending that the amendment violates her constitutional rights. The legal reasoning in Abrahamson’s complaint reflects just the sort of activist nonsense that Abrahamson has been notorious for during her decades on the court.

Less than three months later, the federal judge handling the case—an Obama appointee, no less—will grant summary judgment against Abrahamson.

Articles You May Like

Paul Brian, 1951-2024
Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs under CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION for alleged “pay-to-play” scheme
HUGS! Hunter Biden Verdict Gets Mawkish Treatment at New York Times
House passes National Defense Authorization Act, but 3 Republicans opposed passage
NDAA Puts NewsGuard, Ad Fontes On Notice … Once Again

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *