There Is No Conservative Case for Blowing Up the Filibuster

POLITICS & POLICY
Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R., KY) walks from the Senate Chamber after eliminating the filibuster rule against Supreme Court nominees in Washington, D.C., April 6, 2017. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)
Nuke-the-filibuster advocates argue that the GOP can reverse bad laws when they come to power. Except they almost never do. See: Obamacare.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

I
n the Wall Street Journal, F. H. Buckley makes the conservative case for dismantling the legislative filibuster. Though Senate procedure may stop bad laws from being implemented, argues Buckley, it also renders a GOP Congress incapable of reversing noxious policies already in existence:

Imagine a new Congress and a new president elected in 2024 to reverse decades of wasteful interest-group bargains. As Mitch McConnell said in 2013, when the Democrats did away with the filibuster for nominations: “Just you wait!”

The most obvious problem with this theoretical proposition is that, no, I can’t imagine such a thing. Judges and policies are not …

Articles You May Like

U.S. runs out of spare “Patriot” missiles for Ukraine, spelling impending Russian victory
Ex-NPR Editor: NPR Needs Some ‘Soul-Searching’ About Serving All Americans
Exposing the harsh reality of Hamas
CIA confirms contractor in damning footage was employed by agency but denies his claims about the agency’s approach to Trump
Revealing Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative debates

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *