This Day in Liberal Judicial Activism—July 6

POLITICS & POLICY
(Shutterstock)

1989—In solo dissent in Hamblen v. Dugger, Florida justice Rosemary Barkett opines that a capital defendant is not permitted to waive his right to present evidence of mitigating circumstances. Such waiver, she contends, somehow makes it impossible for the sentencing court to carry out its statutory role of weighing aggravating and mitigating circumstances when deciding whether to impose a death sentence.

But our adversary system routinely depends on the parties to choose what evidence to present. When no evidence of mitigating circumstances is offered, it simply follows that the mitigating circumstances carry zero weight.

2008—Nearly two decades after President Reagan left office, Washington Post columnist David S. Broder evidently still doesn’t understand Reagan or judicial conservatism. Or maybe he’s just trying to pander to Justice Kennedy. Recounting Kennedy’s status as Reagan’s third pick to fill the seat of Justice Lewis Powell, Broder claims that the pick “turned out to be successful beyond Reagan’s wildest dreams” and that Kennedy has “fulfill[ed] the expectations that Reagan and others had for him from the start.” Yeah, right.

Articles You May Like

JPMorgan and BlackRock back out of United Nations’ climate action group after ESG initiatives go too far
Cops protect Jewish professor as students hysterically underscore ‘Zionists are not welcome’ at San Jose State University
Will Biden’s Age Finish His Campaign?
These are Glenn Beck’s initial thoughts following his interview with Tucker Carlson
Colon cancer on the rise in young adults: GMOs, vaccines and synthetic folic acid all to blame

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *