Republicans Shouldn’t Fall for Biden’s Infrastructure Charade

President Joe Biden speaks following a bipartisan meeting with U.S. senators about the proposed framework for the infrastructure bill at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 24, 2021. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

Last month, we warned Republicans about the pitfalls of indulging President Biden’s infrastructure fantasies. The bipartisan framework announced Thursday isn’t causing us to change our mind.

There is much to dislike about the so-called compromise proposal (even putting aside the minor detail that the nation’s infrastructure is not, in fact, in dire need of repair). The deal negotiated by a group of five Republicans and five Democrats would mean $579 billion in new spending that, when slapped on top of what the federal government is already slated to spend on infrastructure, could mean $1.2 trillion in outlays over the next eight years. In a year when the White House expects U.S. debt as a share of the economy to be the highest in American history, the plan is vague about how everything will be paid for. A White House “fact sheet” touting the plan has a line-by-line breakdown of the various new spending initiatives along with descriptions, but only bullet points on the proposed financing mechanisms, without any dollar amounts. Those bullet points include lines such as, “State and local investment in broadband infrastructure” and “Repurpose unused relief funds from 2020 emergency relief legislation.” Additionally, the plan lists “Reduce the IRS tax gap” and “Unemployment insurance integrity.” In other words, they couldn’t get the numbers to add up, so they went for the old Washington standby of combating waste, fraud, and abuse.

While this framework deserves to be rejected on the substance alone, it doesn’t get to the heart of the matter, which is that this entire process is a charade. Democrats have made their plans very clear. They want to move the bipartisan plan through the Senate on a parallel track with a reconciliation bill stuffed with liberal wish-list items that will be rammed through on a pure party-line basis.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said both bills would be moved through the Senate next month, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the House would not even consider acting on the bipartisan bill unless the far-left one also passes the Senate.

You Might Like

That brings us to the ringleader — Biden himself.

Appearing in front of the White House with the group of senators on Thursday, Biden was all smiles, touting the amazing bipartisan achievement. He spoke about how he had to give up some of the things that he wanted, such as the “human infrastructure” of subsidized child care, to reach an agreement.

“They have my word,” Biden said. “I’ll stick with what we’ve proposed, and they’ve given me their word as well,” he said. He earlier claimed, “A lot of us go back a long way, where we’re used to doing one thing — give each other our word, and that’s the end.”

But that is not the end.

Later in the day, Biden told reporters that he would not in fact sign the bipartisan infrastructure deal unless it came to his desk together with the Democrats-only reconciliation package. He said, of the bipartisan bill, “if only one comes to me, this is the only one that comes to me, I’m not signing it. It’s in tandem.”

Given that Democrats are treating the two bills as a package deal, why should Republicans view them any other way? Biden is not in fact giving up any ground by signing on to some provisions with Republicans if he’s going to get everything he wants anyway via a partisan parliamentary maneuver. All that Republicans would be giving Biden would be the veneer of bipartisan cover. Imagine if, in 2017, Donald Trump and Senator Mitch McConnell announced a bipartisan deal with Democrats on some tax-reform provisions they agreed with, then passed the rest of the Republican tax bill anyway and called it bipartisan tax reform. It would be viewed as absurd, and rightly so. Such is the case this time around.

Republicans should reject this patently ridiculous and inaptly named “compromise.”

Articles You May Like

Convicted Child Sex Offender Given Custody of Little Girl – Then Gets Her Pregnant
Covid jab spike proteins invade “all major organs,” accelerate cellular aging
George Washington University Offers ‘Morning-After’ Pills In A Campus Vending Machine
Nets Ignore Pro-Life Activist’s Acquittal on Bogus Biden Admin Charges
Ron DeSantis reportedly preparing for 2024 presidential run. A ‘more angry’ Donald Trump takes shot at ‘disloyal’ Florida governor.

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *