Trial Begins for Sarah Palin’s Defamation Lawsuit Against the New York Times


Former Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin’s lawsuit against the New York Times is heading to trial on Monday.

The lawsuit centers around a New York Times op-ed that falsely implicated Palin’s political action committee (PAC) for “political incitement” in the shooting of former Rep. Gabby Giffords.

In June 2017, the same day that a leftist shot Rep. Steve Scalise during a congressional baseball practice, the Times ran an op-ed headlined “America’s Lethal Politics.” The piece falsely claimed that Palin’s PAC had shared a map with 20 Democratic lawmakers, including Giffords, in “stylized crosshairs” prior to her shooting. They claimed that “the link to political incitement was clear.”

Palin says that former editorial page editor James Bennet defamed her by publishing the claim.

TRENDING: Nothing to See Here… CDC Is Monitoring Local Residents for Cold-like Symptoms Following Crash of Semi Carrying 100 CDC Test Monkeys

You Might Like

“The trial before U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff marks a rare instance of a major media company defending its editorial practices before an American jury. Opening statements could take place as soon as Monday, following jury selection,” Reuters reports.

Though the lies were clear, Palin will have to prove the editor acted with “actual malice” to the jury. Ironically, the “actual malice” standard was set by the Supreme Court in the case of New York Times v. Sullivan, 58 years ago. Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch have been open about wanting to revisit that standard.

Reuters noted that “the Times quickly corrected the editorial to disclaim any connection between political rhetoric and the Arizona shooting, and Bennet has said he did not intend to blame Palin.” The lawmaker does not believe that the error was unintentional, however.

Palin is seeking unspecified damages, but the court documents estimate there was approximately $421,000 in damage to her reputation.

The Times has essentially argued that since she was already controversial, they have a right to libel her.

“Gov. Palin already was viewed as a controversial figure with a complicated history and reputation, and in the time since the editorial was published, Gov. Palin has prospered,” the Times said in a Jan. 17 court filing.

Articles You May Like

AOC Wants To Ditch Her Tesla, Because Tolerance
Whose Fault Is It If Your Child Becomes Addicted to Social Media?
Science teachers go full libtard, ordering students to stop using “oppressive” words like mother and father
Nets Lobby Hard for Dem Gun Grabbing Schemes, Trash 2nd Amendment
NBA And ESPN Tout Gun Control Laws During Broadcast

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published.