Protests and Pandemics

US
Protesters wearing masks look on as Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan addresses the crowd during a rally in Seattle, Wash., June 2, 2020. (Lindsey Wasson/Reuters)

How to square the circle of insisting on social distancing to fight the spread of COVID-19 while supporting large-scale protests? Public-health experts are here to help, as is Shannon Paulus of Slate. “Public Health Experts Say the Pandemic Is Exactly Why Protests Must Continue,” reads the headline to the story, which notably lacks anyone who is willing to say that the protests will reduce the death toll from the disease or even to deny that it will increase them.

The central claim, rather, is that racism is (quoting one of the experts) “one of the more dangerous infectious diseases” and that fighting it is therefore a blow for public health even if it comes at the price of spreading COVID-19. “In the long term, breaking down structural racism is an unequivocal public health good,” Paulus writes.

But even if we grant that premise — something that the slipperiness of the phrase “breaking down structural racism” counsels against — the planted axiom is that these protests are likely to be an effective means of reducing racism. It is not at all obvious that they are, especially when the protests spill over into violence and looting.

What should also comfort us about the protests’ role in spreading disease, Paulus writes, is that they are “happening as states are relaxing stay at home orders, as largely white crowds head to pool parties and brunch.” (Let’s pause to marvel at the rigorous empiricism, doubtless expert-approved, by which we can ascertain that it’s “largely white crowds” that are exercising newly recovered freedoms.) Because of this, another expert tells Paulus that if COVID-19 cases spike, “we’re not going to be able to pin this on the protests.”

It’s a point that is logically incompatible with Paulus’s next move, which is to try to pin any such increase in cases on the police. Note again, though, that Paulus and her expert aren’t denying that protests will spread a deadly disease. They’re just saying it won’t be possible to prove how much they do it. Which underscores that this is just politics. If racism can reasonably be likened to a dangerous infectious disease, so, surely, can stupidity.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.


Articles You May Like

‘Enemy of free speech’: Journalist Eli Lake dismantles anti-Israel activists who lament the closure of college encampments
Incentivizing Terrorism: CBS Hails Ireland, Spain, Norway Recognizing Palestinian State
‘What a disgrace’: Netanyahu blasts ICC prosecutor for seeking arrest warrants against him and another Israeli official
George Conway runs anti-Trump billboard in Florida: ‘VOTE FOR JOE NOT THE PSYCHO’
Liquor store owner shoots shoplifting suspect; NYC district attorney presses charges against owner

1 Comment

  1. Pandemic pre planned IE Fauci speech to Georgetown in 2017.

    Said riots pre planned:
    1. brick piles sited nearby
    2. unmarked cars carry looters to riots.
    3. ground controllers with 2 way radio & earbuds direct looters.
    4. media & governors, mayors Pro looters.

    & then riots HIT just as we pull out of lockdowns.

    ALL pre planned or planned for X.

    Anyone seen in any past riots:?
    prepaid brick piles.
    guidance with controllers with 2 way radioes.
    Mayor & Gov OKs looters.
    unmarked cars carry looters & arms to riot sites.
    social media aiding looters.

    Anyone since 1965 riots to date??

    Riots over same issue & get NO result or changes.
    Since 1965.

    Yet reject ideas to improve Inner cities, same results.
    Class warfare as Race War: see Tucker Carlson FNC report.
    Dems WANT Power.
    & riots till Nov??

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *