Amy Coney Barrett Wasn’t a Trump Rubber Stamp After All

POLITICS & POLICY




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

T
he Supreme Court this week rejected a Republican bid to undo the certification of Joe Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania. No one on the Court dissented — and “no one” includes the newest associate justice, Amy Coney Barrett.

This is somewhat confusing when we consider that one of the central accusations leveled against Barrett by Democrats and liberal pundits was that she would — when not banishing cancer-stricken minority children from hospitals — steal the election for Donald Trump (whose tweets certainly did not help matters).

It was not just the typical adjective-laden melodrama from Slate’s Mark Joseph Stern — a “sinister argument

Articles You May Like

Doocy, Wegmann, Gutierrez Grill Inept KJP Over Biden’s Inaction on Pro-Hamas Students
DEI worker sues University of Minnesota after she was fired for posing in front of an Israeli flag littered with swastikas
‘Those children were hunted down and killed’: Oklahoma police stunned by family massacre where 10-year-old boy was unharmed
Emily Blunt says algorithms ‘frustrate me,’ adds it cannot determine ‘what will be successful’
HYSTERICAL: Stephanopoulos Opens ‘This Week’ With ‘Stakes’ Editorial

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *