Now Profits Are a Justification for Discrimination?

US
(shironosov/iStock/Getty Images)
In what amounts to state-orchestrated discrimination, California is using bizarre grounds to mandate racial and gender diversity on corporate boards.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

T
he trial commenced this week in Crest v. Padilla, a lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch to enjoin California from requiring that publicly held corporations headquartered in California include at least one director who “self-identifies” as a woman. Pursuant to California’s SB 826, by the end of 2021, up to three self-identified women will be required, depending on the size of the board.

In September 2020, two years after enacting SB 826, California went even further, when Governor Newsom signed AB 979 into law. That law requires that California-headquartered public companies also include at least one director from an “underrepresented community,” and …

To Read the Full Story

Articles You May Like

Burglar used stolen credit card to order pizza and have it delivered to his home, St. Louis police say.
Why Has Biden Betrayed Israel? Look at His New Special Counsel
Crews Execute Controlled Demolition to Dismantle Remaining Span of Collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore (VIDEO)
UNC Chapel Hill board votes to cut all funding for DEI and divert budget to public safety after violent protests
BBC Runs Hit Piece on Slovakian Prime Minister Hours After He’s SHOT in Assassination Attempt

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *