Historical Precedent Supports Republicans on Supreme Court Nominations

POLITICS & POLICY




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

A
s I have argued, historical precedents support Senate Republicans in drawing a distinction in election-year Supreme Court nominations. When the president’s party controls the Senate, as it does in 2020, the Senate majority is well within its historic rights in confirming a nominee. It has done so 17 times out of 19. When the opposition party controls the Senate, as it did in 2016, the Senate majority is well within its historic rights in declaring that the two branches are deadlocked and the nomination should be held open for whichever party wins the national election. Only one out of ten …

Articles You May Like

WHAT? Threats Against Jews Disappear From Pro-Hamas Protest Coverage
Mike Rowe raises important question about Ivy League schools as ‘thugs and bullies’ protest Israel: ‘Truly lost its mind’
3 Republican Arizona state House lawmakers vote with Democrats in favor of repealing abortion law
Yeah, They Might Wanna Rethink This: Columbia University Protesters Proclaim ‘We Are Hamas’
Arizona grand jury indicts Republicans over effort to overturn 2020 election, including Giuliani, Meadows, and Jenna Ellis

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *