Lawyer: I’d vote NOT GUILTY for Officer Derek Chauvin. Here’s why.

News & Politics

Former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin is facing several charges for his role in the death of George Floyd. But attorney Andrew Branca, who specializes in self-defense law, joined Glenn Beck on the radio program Tuesday to explain exactly what must be proven in order for those charges to stand.

Did Chauvin act reasonably in the context of the entire situation? Were his actions directly responsible for Floyd’s death, or could it be blamed on factors beyond Chauvin’s control?

Branca also argued that the prosecutor committed misconduct serious enough for a potential appeal, how political tension makes it “impossible” for a fair trial, why he would vote not guilty, and what sentence Chauvin is facing if the actual jury disagrees.

Watch the video below for more details:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

Articles You May Like

ICC prosecutors interview hospital staff in Gaza to gather evidence of Israeli war crimes
PBS’s Amanpour Celebrates ‘Heart of the Pro-Palestinian Campus Peace Movement’
Washington’s bungling of the anti-Semitism bill
‘It’s F****** Scary,’ De Niro Compares Trump To Hitler On MSNBC
FDA detects surge in seizures and heart failure in children who were subjected to COVID-19 jabs

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *