The Sordid Saga of the Sarah Palin Libel Case

US
Sarah Palin and James Bennet look on as U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff instructs the jury on law as they begin deliberations during Palin’s defamation lawsuit trial against the New York Times at the United States Courthouse in New York City, February 11, 2022. (Courtroom sketch: Jane Rosenberg/Reuters)
Judge Jed Rakoff put his thumb on the scale for the New York Times, and there’s little the former Alaska governor can do about it.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

W
hether the New York Times was reckless in Sarah Palin’s libel case is an interesting legal question. But whether Judge Jed Rakoff was reckless in Sarah Palin’s libel case is no question at all: He clearly was.

A nine-person jury found in favor of the Times after a short trial in Manhattan federal court last week, but not before Judge Rakoff’s mind-boggling decision to announce, while the jury was deliberating, that he was throwing out the former Alaska governor’s case. Predictably, several jurors learned about Rakoff’s ruling before the jury reached a verdict that echoed the ruling. The appellate courts should

To Read the Full Story

Articles You May Like

CWC Data Science releases AI Large Language Model – Neo-BioMistral-7B-E3 trained on the entire PubMed data set plus millions of pages of text on natural and herbal medicine
Maddow’s Pro-Fani Electioneering, Disguised As A ‘Sermon’ on Democracy
California College Holding Five Segregated Graduations
Michael Cohen’s former lawyer testifies for defense, clashes with judge in Trump’s New York trial
Biden FALLS APART During Train-Wreck NAACP Speech | Beyond the Headlines

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *