The Real Science of Fetal Heartbeats

POLITICS & POLICY
Anti-abortion protestors hold a demonstration outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., November 1, 2021. (Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters )
The New York Times publishes a ‘report’ attempting to debunk the science underlying pro-life heartbeat bills.




NRPLUS MEMBER ARTICLE

O
ne of the favorite pastimes of legacy media outlets over the past several years has been attempting to discredit the science of fetal heartbeats. Since 2019, more than a dozen states have passed pro-life heartbeat bills, prohibiting abortion after a fetal heartbeat has been detected, which usually takes place around six weeks into pregnancy.

Though nearly all of those laws were immediately blocked in court, one was not: the Texas Heartbeat Act. Despite facing legal challenges, that law has been in effect since September 2021 and early data suggest it has prevented a few thousand abortions in the state (though the …

To Read the Full Story

Articles You May Like

Florida sheriff blamed Biden’s government for ‘victimizing’ Americans after illegal immigrant charged with sexually assaulting child
CNN, Media Freak When GOP’s Rep. Scott Perry Accurately Ties KKK History To Democrats
Massachusetts to convert prison into shelter for illegal aliens
Judge in Trump Trial Faces Corruption Allegations
Mother fights home invader amid sexual assault after he follows her daughters inside

Leave a Comment - No Links Allowed:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *